All queries, questions, or submissions should be sent to the editor, Susan Popham, at firstname.lastname@example.org as a Word attachment.
Programmatic Perspectives, the journal of CPTSC, is soliciting articles about theoretical and practical aspects of technical, professional, and scientific communication program administration. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to,
- Program assessment
- Curriculum development and innovation
- Cross-cultural issues
- Faculty development
- Technology integration
- Relationship building
- Diversity issues
- Program maintenance
- Programs transitions (e.g., expansion from certificate to major)
- Student and faculty recruitment
- Recruitment and retention
- Historical perspectives on program administration
- New program development
The editor welcomes articles of 6,000-10,000 words. Submissions should conform to the latest publication of the APA.
Authors should remove any identifying content to facilitate blind peer review. Please include the author’s name, e-mail address, phone number, and affiliation on a separate cover sheet.
If the article contains illustrations (drawings, photographs, images), please create each illustration in a separate file and zip all files together. Illustrations should be saved at 300 dpi or better in EPS, TIFF, PSD, GIF, or JPG format.
750-1250 words for reviews of single texts
1000-2500 words for reviews of multiple texts
Focus your review on those concerns most relevant to our target audience: technical, professional, and scientific communication administrators and faculty who are interested in the theory and practice of program development and administration. If appropriate, focus your review on how the text(s) contribute to just one aspect of the profession—for example, programmatic assessment or curriculum development. We encourage you to omit relatively minor concerns, such as minute details about what each chapter contains.
If possible, address the following concerns in your review:
- how the text(s) specifically contributes to the profession in terms of programmatic issues and perspectives or how it fails to do so
- how the text(s) compare with similar ones in the profession
Include the following information for each text reviewed:
- author(s) or editor(s)
- place of publication
- date of publication
- number of pages
Provide the following information after the heading and before the first paragraph:
Reviewed by (Your First Name, Your Last Name), (Your Institution)
Use of Citations, Evidence, and Quotations
Use APA style for all citations.
Do not feel obligated to provide extensive evidence (including direct quotations) from the text(s) to support your claims. In fact, we might need to edit supporting evidence to reduce length.
If you decide to provide supporting evidence:
- include page citations for quoted material (for example, Smith makes a strong case that “the profession will raise its stature considerably if more quality research on this topic is completed” (p. 143)
- provide full citations for other publications mentioned in your review
Guidelines for Submitting Reviews
Send the review as an email attachment in Word format to
- Russell Kirkscey Book Review Editor
If you have a question about a book review, please contact Joanna.